What is the different between the ranaissance art vs medieval art?

Lu Snide: The Renaissance patrons wanted art that showed joy in human beauty and life’s pleasures. Renaissance art is more lifelike than in the art of the Middle Ages. Renaissance artists studied perspective, or the differences in the way things look when they are close to something or far away. The artists painted in a way that showed these differences. As a result, their paintings seem to have depth.Some say that in Art we find the most important contribution to the Renaissance. These artists were now considered important people in their own rights. They were funded by their merchant patrons. They wanted a more naturalistic style of people. If you look at examples of comparing and contrasting Medieval vs. Renaissance Art, you would see that in the Medieval the people mostly painted saints and religious themes, they did not present humans like "humans" - meaning that they did not have individual characteristics. The renaissance changed all of that. Artists contrasted b! etween light and darkness, used 3-D images, and used single-point perspective....Show more

Donovan Stallons: medieval art focuses is older and focuses on more religious aspects of life as well as chivalry, knights, and legends. renaissance was the birth of humanism so it took a more secular view on art and it had many old Greek and Roman elements in it.

Danica Timperman: the thought Renaissance are replaced into extra humanistic and much less religious is actual, inspite of the shown fact that to no longer the severe that some would mean. look on the main familiar works by making use of Michelangelo, da Vinci, et al. The Pieta, the Sistine Chapel Ceiling, the final Judgement, The final Supper, all the dissimilar Madonna's and new child, The Moses, the dissimilar David's, even the mythologically themed artwork by making use of Boccaccio and others...there replaced into particularly some religious portray and sculpting taking place. there replaced into, besides th! e undeniable fact that lots that replaced into no longer, as a! n occasion, the Mona Lisa and diverse different portraitures, Holbein's The Ambassadors, and Eyck's Arnolfini Marriage. nevertheless, the Renaissance replaced into no longer overwhelmingly humanistic, a minimum of no longer interior the extra modern-day sense of the term. And there replaced into truly some medieval paintings that replaced into 'humanistic,' from the Bayeax Tapestry to dissimilar works depicting the on a regular basis existence in cities and existence of the serfs working the land....Show more

Melvina Bieri: The main difference lies in the way life was seen. Medieval times were times when you were either educated or not, depending on your origin. To be educated, you had to go through some religious schooling, and this was really only for the "elevated" classes, i.e. the lords and aristocracy. Most people were not educated and just lived their lives as serfs on the land of their master. Life was centred around religiously influenced schooling, and wa! s actually very limited because of what the church would accept.The Renaissance brought in a re-evaluation of the classic norms of art, which didn't always coincide with what the church was saying, e.g. statues of naked people, which were honouring the human body as it is - this was a threat to the churches aiming to keep things "clean" as much as they could. The difference is about a way of looking at life, art, culture and saying "we want to celebrate life as it is" rather than "how it should be". I hope this helps....Show more